This webpage is http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/guest3.html
ON GUN CONTROL
[LIZNOTE -- editorial disagreement with Guest]
by Gina Guest
issues, including violence against women, frequently generate more emotion
than reasoned response, especially among those who want to minimize or
obscure the problem. And one of the tactics most often used is to
imply that there are so many contradictory studies or statistics that no
conclusion can be reached and all figures are equally suspect.
While the statistics I've seen agree with
the commonly-made statement that the rate of accidental death caused by
firearms is at an all time low, that "low" still takes the life
of about 1,600 people per year and injures tens of thousands more.
It's true that more children accidentally
drown in swimming pools than are accidentally killed by guns.
But while we might not "blame"
the swimming pool, bathtub or lighter for an accidental death, we would
certainly hold the owner and/or manufacturer responsible if their negligence
or defective design were responsible for the accident. (Which raises
the question of how any death or injury by a firearm can be considered
"accidental" when the purpose for which the firearm is designed
is to cause death or injury.)
There is nothing "superstitious or
totemic" to the power we attach to a bullet -- it is designed to maim
or kill and in that it differs from all other "lifeless, willess objects"
other than explosive, chemical and biological weapons. Recognition
of that fact is not predicated upon "personal like or dislike"
any more than recognizing that the purpose of a swimming pool is recreational
is predicated on whether one personally enjoys or dislikes swimming.
While there is
tremendous debate about the meaning and implications of the figures about
firearms deaths and injuries in the United States, there is no substantial
disagreement on the numbers themselves:
- In 1995 a firearm was the weapon used
in about 7 out of 10 murders in the United States. In 1994, there
were 39,720 firearm-related deaths in the United States; 13,593 people
were murdered with handguns; 20,540 committed suicide by using firearms;
1,610 people were killed accidentally with firearms; and the remaining
3,977 died from other firearm-related incidents including self-defense;
justifiable use of force by a law enforcement officer; and homicide using
a firearm other than a handgun. About 1.3 million violent crimes
were reported which included the use of firearm, more than 86% of them
involved a handgun.
- More U.S. teens aged 15-19 die of gunshot
wounds than of all natural causes combined, and firearms are involved in
65% of all suicides among persons under the age of 25.
- An estimated 150,000 people are treated
annually in U.S. hospital emergency units for nonfatal gun-related injuries
and approximately 80,000 require admission for in-patient care. Cost estimates
range from $1.4 billion to $4.0 billion annually in direct medical costs
and $19 billion annually in indirect costs, such as lost future earnings,
permanent disability, etc. An estimated 86% of gun shot victims receiving
medical treatment in hospital emergency units are uninsured or insured
by Medicaid, so tax payers bear most of the cost of their medical care.
- The F.B.I.'s stolen gun file contains
over 2 million reports, 60% of which are reports of stolen handguns, although
handguns represent only one third of all firearms privately owned in the
Opponents of gun control maintain that
handguns are a major deterrent to crime and save far more law abiding citizens
from death and injury at the hands of criminals than are victimized by
the use of guns. Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz, claim that armed potential
victims kill between 2,000 and 3,000 criminals and wound an additional
9,000 to 17,000.
Supporters of gun control maintain that
the availability of handguns increases the likelihood that a crime will
be committed on impulse, or while someone is intoxicated or under emotional
stress as well as increasing the likelihood of death and serious injury
for victims of crime. They also maintain that an assailant's use
of a gun makes it less likely that the victim of an assault, robbery or
rape will attempt to resist or escape.
Opponents of gun control maintain that
most victims of crimes involving handguns have a criminal record or are
engaged in a criminal or hazardous lifestyle and that persons who commit
suicide with a handgun would commit suicide by another method if a gun
was not available.
Supporters of gun control maintain that
while the majority of gunshot victims are engaged in a crime or criminal
lifestyle a substantial minority are truly innocent victims. They
point out that in virtually all cases where a deranged gunman goes on a
shooting spree the victims are both innocent and would be alive and uninjured
had the shooter not had access to a gun. Moreover while they concede that
some people who commit suicide with a gun would attempt to kill themselves
by other means, that argue that suicides who use a gun are more likely
to succeed than those who use other means and are more likely to attempt
suicide impulsively in response to a single traumatic incident or sudden
While both sides argue vehemently over
specific studies and numbers, even opponents of gun control concede that
there is some evidence that having a gun in the home increases the risk
of accidental gunshot injury and injury or death from being shot by a family
member, although they maintain that gun control supporters greatly inflate
the increased risk. They also argue that the gun owner's ability
to deter or disable intruders more than compensates for the risk involved.
In summary the issue of guns in our society
is a complex one that demands thoughtful dialog.
An opponent of gun control asks us to consider
the case of a friend and recent co-worker living in fear because the judge
issued a mutual restraining order barring her and her abusive spouse from
possessing a firearm.
He points out that, "If he comes for
her, and there is every chance that he will, she will have to fight a bigger,
stronger, more experienced, and violent person barehanded for her life."
He challenges us to, "tell her that she and her kids are in
more danger from an inanimate thing than from him."
While I certainly understand this fear
for her, and the frustration with a system that so often fails to protect
abused women, statistically the danger to this woman and her children is
increased because her abuser is likely to have easy access to a firearm
and unlikely to comply with any part of the restraining order including
it's prohibition against firearms.
that she would be better able to defend herself if she had a gun isn't
supported by the thousands of battered women I've spoken with and read
about. Frequently the abusive spouse stalks and shoots them from a distance.
In many other cases he appears to simply materialize and attacks so quickly
that they are unable to flee or shoot. In other cases where the woman
has a gun or other weapon he uses a child as a shield to prevent her from
If she does defend herself with a gun she
stands a good chance of losing her children (quite possibly to him should
she merely wound him) and spending years in jail. Assuming she wounds
or kills him and avoids going to jail, she is reinforcing the message he
has given their children -- that violence is an acceptable way to solve
one's problems. While either outcome may be better than her being
killed by him I think we have to demand something more helpful and hopeful
for her and her children.
Gina Guest, 1998
Guns Used in Crime: Firearms,
Crime, and Criminal Justice-Selected Findings. No. 5. Rockville, MD: U.S.
Dept of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics: 1995. Publication no. NCJ-148201.
Cook PJ, Ludwig J. Guns in
America: National Survey of Private Ownership and Use of Firearms. National
Institute of Justice Research in Brief. Rockville, MD: U.S. Dept of Justice,
Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice; 1997. Common
Core of Data [public-use database]. Washington, DC: National Center for
Education Statistics, U.S. Dept of Education; 1994.
U.S. Department of Justice,
Bureau of Justice Statistics. Sourcebook of Criminal Statistics-1994. Washington,
DC: U.S. Dept of Justice; 1995.
Advance Data From Vital and
Health Statistics of the National Center for Health Statistics. Rockville,
MD: U.S. Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service,
Health Resources Administration; 1994;242:1-12.
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
U.S. Department of Justice. Handguns used in more than one million violent
crimes; the use of semi-automatic guns in murders is increasing. Press
release, July 9, 1995.
Ash P, Kellermann AL, Fuqua-Whitley
D, Johnson A. Gun acquisition and use by juvenile offenders. JAMA. 1996;275:1754-8.
Suicide among children, adolescents,
and young adults-United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1995;44:289-91.
Annest JL, Mercy JA, Gibson
DR, Ryan GW. National estimates of nonfatal firearm-related injuries. Beyond
the tip of the iceberg, JAMA. 1995;273:1749-54.
Rice DR, MacKenzie EJ. Cost
of Injury in the United States: A Report to Congress. San Francisco: Institute
for Health and Aging, University of California; Baltimore, MD: Injury Prevention
Center, Johns Hopkins University; 1989.
Kizer KW, Vassar MJ, Harry
RL, Layton KD. Hospitalization charges, costs, and income for firearm-related
injuries at a university trauma center. JAMA. 1995;273:1768-73.
Max W, Rice DP. Shooting
in the dark: estimating the costs of firearm injuries. Health Aff (Millwood).
Headden S. Guns, money and
medicine. U.S. News & World Report. 1 July 1996.
General Accounting Office.
Trauma Care: Lifesaving System Threatened by Unreimbursed Costs and Other
Factors. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Health for Families and
the Uninsured, U.S. Senate Committee on Finance. Washington, DC: General
Accounting Office; 1991. Publication no. GAO/HRD-91-57.]
|March 2002 --
Harvard Study links rates of gun ownership with young deaths
Children are much more likely to be murdered, commit
suicide or die accidentally because of guns in states and regions with
higher levels of household firearm ownership, according to a new study
by Harvard researchers.
The study, published in The Journal of Trauma, is significant
because it shows that the mere presence of firearms leads to more violent
death among children aged 5 to 14, said Dr. Matthew Miller, the lead author.
''When most people buy a gun, they do so with the presumption
that guns make them safer,'' Miller said in an interview. ''Our results
suggest strongly that this presumption is not warranted and that the children
that parents seek to protect with guns are instead being killed by guns.''
While other studies have shown links between teenage suicide
and guns, this is the first national study to examine
the connection between firearm ownership and violent death among younger
children, said Miller, associate director of Harvard's
Injury Control Research Center.
The study looked at data from all 50 states from 1988
to 1997. In that period, 6,817 children between 5 and 14 years old died
from firearms: 3,447 from homicides, 1,782 from accidental shootings, and
1,588 from suicide.
The study showed that the five
states with the highest gun ownership levels had many more firearm-related
deaths among children than the five states with the lowest levels of gun
The two groups of states had almost the same number
of children, but in the high gun-ownership states there were 253 accidental
firearm deaths compared to just 15 in the low gun-ownership states.
There were 153 firearm suicides in the high gun-ownership
states compared to 22 in the low-ownership states and there were 298 firearm
murders in the high gun-ownership states compared to 86 in the low-ownership
Meanwhile, the rates of nonfirearm-related suicides and
murders in the two groups of states were much closer, leading Miller to
conclude the increase in deaths was attributable to the higher number of
''The large difference in gun-related deaths compared
with the low level of difference in non-firearm deaths allows us to say
that guns are playing some role,'' Miller said. The difference remains
even when the data is controlled for poverty, education and urbanization,
the study found.
The five states with the highest rates of gun ownership
are Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas and West Virginia. The five
with the lowest are Hawaii, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey and
This story ran on page C3 of the Boston Globe on 3/5/2002.