liznotes feedback

Make America Great Again! -- Donald J. Trump 2016

  Have a comment?

Dec 31, 2016:

Best Wishes to All Deplorables

Dec 19, 2016:

Is SNOPES liberally biased? Absolutely.
Here's a great, current example of SNOPES's
propaganda on the subject of the electoral college:

The SNOPES headline at the top of its article (PDF) is
"Law professor Larry Lessig claims that at least twenty Republican electors are considering abandoning the President-elect."
In large, green-colored ALL CAPS with a checkmark, an answer is given as
It thus appears on a quick look that the answer given is to Lessig's "claim" made in the headline, that "at least twenty Republican electors are considering abandoning the President-elect". But SNOPES's headline is not what is being "fact-checked". The answer is only "true" as to another "claim", a bland, innocuous claim printed in small type directly under the large picture (where it looks like a caption and could be missed):
"CLAIM: A law professor is working to take Donald Trump's election win
away by appealing to electoral college voters."
SNOPES's headline and "explanation" gratuitously not only parrot Lessig's unverifiable claim about what "twenty electors" are "considering" (which is irrelevant to answering SNOPES's little reworded sanitized claim that it has labelled "TRUE"), but the article goes on to "prove" that Lessig made the claim, while expounding on how Hillary "won the popular vote by 2.8 million votes" and uncritically republishing Lessig's argument -- which itself contains multiple undiscussed dubious or false statements:
"Never in our history has the argument for electors exercising their independent judgment been as overwhelmingly strong -- because of the concerns about foreign involvement in our election, because of Mr. Trump's refusal to comply with constitutional limitations on foreign assets, and because of the overwhelming popular vote margin by his opponent."
Lessig's opinion is presented as a statement of fact, purportedly backed up by reasons presented themselves as statements of fact. The argument has no relevance to the truth or falsity of the "fact" (in small type, above) that is the actual one misleadingly being "fact-checked" by SNOPES, and moreover, it is itself false or misleading (and un-fact-checked) political propaganda:
    1. There has been no public evidence to date of any "foreign involvement in our election" so who the hell knows whether "concerns" (of whom? how widespread?) are valid. (More).
    [But consider past involvement in our elections via the Soviet-owned U.S. Communist Party, and recent foreign donations to progressive interests, astroturfing websites, the Clinton Foundation and various PACs. Also compare Obama's direct involvement in attempting to throw the Israeli election against Netanyahu. Etc.]

    2. The negative insinuation that Trump has "refused" to comply with some kind of "constitutional limitations on foreign assets" implies illegal acts by Trump even prior to taking office. It is flat-out false (to the extent it's not just unintelligible -- but the law professor's gibberish might sound good to a non-lawyer).

    3. The assertion that Hillary overwhelmingly "won the popular vote" is specious. Trump won 83% of the counties in the U.S. and lost mostly only those areas of the country having a lot of known voting fraud and/or illegal immigrants.

Here's a "lizcheck" on the last point. I worked as a poll attorney in Broward County, Florida on election day. In my small area alone, I stopped perhaps thousands of discarded ballots from being saved in readable format. These would be either "mistake" ballots or collected "absentee" ballots whose voters came to vote in person. These ballots are supposed to be "spoiled" so that they cannot be machine-read. This is supposed to happen before another ballot is issued to the voter. Given the precincts involved, I know that these ballots would have been overwhelmingly Democrat. In about half of the precincts that I monitored, instead of being properly spoiled so that they could not be fed into a machine at a later time, these ballots were being saved in machine-readable state. There is only one reason for this -- unless you are naive enough to believe that experienced election workers all coincidentally had similar misunderstandings of how to spoil discarded ballots and interestingly were keeping them (with the exception of one precinct where they were stuffed into a plastic bag) in neat, out of the way stacks with an ineffectual "void" lightly scribbled on them.

In multiple precincts in Detroit it now has been proved that somehow there were more votes than there were signed-in voters. This is precisely the outcome that would have occurred in Broward County had saved discarded ballots later been fed into the voting machines.

[Note that this same anomaly apparently happened throughout Ohio in the 2012 election (there were reports of 100% pro-Obama precincts with more votes than even registered voters.) And remember that there also was widespread voter fraud via ACORN in the 2008 election.]

Moreover, in California, which logged votes so overwhelmingly Democrat that this state alone could account for more than ALL of Clinton's "popular vote victory" margin, consider these facts: many Republicans (and there are many in the state, albeit not a majority) didn't bother to vote because in addition to being discouraged by fake exit polls from eastern states that closed earlier, their vote in the winner-take-all Democrat state wouldn't have changed anything anyway. In addition, there was no Republican candidate on the ballot for Senate, which otherwise might have brought out Republicans to vote -- weirdly, two Dems were running against each other, so this too likely depressed potential pro-Trump turnout in California. (For these same reasons, why bother to have any significant Republican poll watcher or poll attorney presence in the state -- it was going Democrat, no matter what.)

Lastly, throughout 2016, along with California's new law giving illegal aliens driver licenses, there was a widespread heavy push to do "motor voter" registration, which in no way adequately (or at all) checked citizenship. Recall that sweet interview in which, when asked what he thought about "undocumented citizens" "afraid to vote" because of fear of being deported, Obama responded that all citizens have the right to vote and there is no cross-checking with immigrant databases. (More on California voting fraud.)

Given the above, coupled with the insane, often vicious, hysterics emanating post-election out of some of these Democrat areas, there is not a shred of doubt in my mind of widespread Democratic voting fraud in California and other Democrat strongholds. (In other words, we don't actually know whether, or to what extent, Hillary actually "won the popular vote" with valid legal votes.)

[And yes: the party of corruption is Democrat. NOT Republican. Look historically and currently at all the famous corrupt city political machines such as Tammany Hall in NYC, Mayor Daley in Chicago. Not to mention the unions and mafia involvement in them, bastions of nasty. Jim Crow, etc. All Democrat.]

If the foregoing isn't enough to convince you that SNOPES is politically biased, without my having to go into many, many other examples, then take a gander at what its article chooses to put links on -- petitions, commentary and advocacy (not "facts") -- and its cited "sources" -- NPR plus two of the perhaps three biggest purveyors of rabid anti-Trump headlines and "fake news" in the past election: CNN (the station which, among many other transgressions, shared debate questions via Donna Brazile with Hillary Clinton), WaPo (which is now globalist Amazon owner Jeff Bezos's anti-Trump blog), and the NYTimes (whose biggest shareholder is anti-Trump Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim and which has lost much of the credibility it once had).

One final point: in each state we now vote for electors based on who those electors have pledged to support. That is how we choose electors, according to state laws. We do not get resumes of the electors and then select them to "represent us" based on our assessment of their analytical abilities and "judgment". That may have been Hamilton's original idea, but -- note to Hollywood nincompoops and lawyer Lessig -- that's not how "the states" currently vote for president.

About the rest of those "fact checkers" [PDF]...

Dec 16 and 18, 2016:

from MOTUS...

the NO

Dec 10, 2016:

Go... AMERICA! (Finally, a Real President!)



Dec 08, 2016:

arrogant, ignorant, and inconsistent

I don't read Frederick deBoer, Ph.D.'s blog, so this comes by way of Thomas Lifson at American Thinker, who this morning discussed deBoer's post "condescending, certain, and incoherent". Dr. deBoer (a liberal) points out what should be obvious to anyone who actually is an educated individual, but apparently is not because, Lifson notes, of the existence of a "shallow groupthink that characterizes political discussions in the ivory tower". deBoer writes:
This is a constant condition for me: interacting with liberals and leftists who affect a stance of bored impatience, who insist that the answers to moral and political questions are so obvious that every reasonable person already agrees, who then lack the ability to explain the thinking underlying their answers to those questions in a remotely compelling way...

Everything is obvious; all the hard work is done; only an idiot couldn't see what the right thing to do is. And then you poke a little bit at the foundation and it just collapses. I suppose the condescension and the fragility are related conditions, the bluster a product of the insecurity at the heart of it all. You act like everything is obvious precisely because you can't articulate your position.

Read deBoer's post. It will give you hope. Compare it with the below special comment by a forensic psychologist yesterday on the psylaw listserve -- ironically someone who has given presentations on "confirmatory bias", who (goodgod) has done custody evaluations, and who is a perfect example of the inarticulate mental foggery that young Dr. deBoer is starting to notice:
We were brought up on the Milgram studies at Yale and The Stanford Prison experiment. They inform our thinking everyday and is why we are terrified of a Trump Administration.

Emblazon on your foreheads: "It happened here."

Dec 05, 2016:

Prager U. must-see video about anti-Semitism
that was banned by youtube as "hate speech"

It's available at The website has a link to a petition.
(Monday, Dec. 5, 1:40pm EST): YouTube has entirely removed PragerU's new video with Kasim Hafeez, a British Muslim who is a pro-Israel activist. In the video, Hafeez explains how he overcame the anti-Semitic indoctrination that radicalized him from an early age. Within hours of the video's release Monday morning, YouTube flagged it for "hate speech" and took it down. PragerU is disputing YouTube's removal of the video.

UPDATE, Tuesday, Dec. 6 a.m.: Back up:


Dec 03, 2016:

If you're still getting your "news" from the New York Times
(and WaPo, MSNBC, CNN et al.) you've become deadly ignorant.

I have a bachelor's degree in journalism. Whatever happened to "who, what, where, when, why and how". Good grief. The major media has gone insane. Fake news? We now have American Pravda.


Also see: James O'Keefe, speech in Palm Beach last month.

(By the way, anyone remember when prospective "National Security Advisor" Susan Rice went on multiple TV shows to lie about a video being the cause of the Benghazi terrorist attack? If you like your plan (or Iran nuclear deal) you can keep it, and Bergdahl is your kind of hero. Fake news indeed...)

Dec 02, 2016:

Kellyanne Conway Would Be A Feminist Hero If She Were A Democrat

Julie Kelly writes in the Federalist:
She's a lawyer, pollster, and business owner. She's a mom of four, and a self-made woman. Why do feminists ignore her? Oh, that's right -- she's Republican...

If she were a Democrat, Conway would be the toast of women's groups across the country, feted in the media, splashed across the pages of Vogue and Cosmo. She would be touted as a future candidate herself. Maybe even Lena Dunham would've thrown out a tweet or two after her Election Night shower-cry...

But I suspect there's even more to this than partisan politics. After all, you can't accuse a man of misogyny -- which literally means "hatred of women" -- if he puts a female in charge of the riskiest, most important endeavor of his life...

[T]he pearl clutching by the female left went into overdrive after Trump was elected, with women weeping and fearing for their daughters -- as if Trump is a one-man Boko Haram ready to swipe them out of their classrooms and turn them into drink cart girls.

Now that Trump is appointing women to key posts such as UN Ambassador, Secretary of Education, and Deputy National Security Advisor, their anger is rising rather than abating. If anything, this election has further revealed the hypocrisy of the left -- particularly modern-day feminists -- who despite all their talk of empowerment, are now exposed as a weak and whiny sisterhood of victims.

GEN Mad Dog Mattis

So what do we tell our daughters?
Be less like Lena and more like Kellyanne.

Nov 28, 2016:

There are 3,141 counties in the United States. Trump won in excess of 83% of them.

New York City, Chicago, DC, Broward County
Florida, and California's west coast don't get
to speak for the rest of the country.

Want to reform the Electoral College?
Give each county a vote.

Nov 12, 2016:

Trump Acceptance Resistance Disorder (TARD):

      Signs and Symptoms:
      ...characterized by a persistent unwillingness to accept that Donald Trump is going to Make America Great Again. Individual sufferers often display signs of paranoia and delusion; in acute cases psychotic episodes have been observed...

      Causes and Mechanisms:
      ...TARD appears to correlate closely with the following environmental and behavioral factors:

        * Membership in the Democratic party
        * Identifying as a Feminist
        * Currently enrolled in college, and/or
        * In Possession of a Liberal Arts college degree
        * Cuckoldry
        * Living in a densely populated metropolitan area
        * Massive student debt
        * Spotty or non-existent work history
        * Hipsterism

      ...straightforward. Ask the patient if Donald Trump is going to be the next President of the United States of America. Some patients will become agitated, and may attempt to deflect...

      ...highly comorbid with Paraphilic Infantilism, Emotional Eating, Autism Spectrum, Bush Derangement Syndrome, and adult bedwetting.

      ...only known effective treatment is exposure therapy... requires that they be separated from their hive-mind support apparatus...

Nov 11, 2016:

Proud to be the mother of productive American citizens
   ... and not shit-for-brains losers who riot in the streets.

"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free." -- Ronald Reagan

"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." -- Thomas Jefferson

"A cadet will not lie, cheat, steal or tolerate those who do." -- United States Military Academy

Nov 08, 2016:

The Fat Lady is Singing:

UPDATE, encore, and best meltdown ever:


Nov 07, 2016:

About those increasing military suicides:

It's finally starting to be recognized that "mental health treatment" is causing the alarming increases in suicides among our military. It's unfortunate that so little investigative reporting on this is done by the major media because, of course, drug companies are one of the biggest advertisers. There's a good article today, however, in the Baltimore Sun, Stop overmedicating our vets PDF. Here's the report referenced in the article (I wish the author, biology prof Patrick D. Hahn, had linked to some of the studies.) Excerpt:
The suicide rate for those who received mental health treatment is higher than those who did not. No surprise there: It seems reasonable to assume that those who received mental health treatment were more impaired.

The surprise comes when we compare users who had no diagnosis of mental health or substance abuse issues (and who presumably were less impaired) with those who did have a diagnosis (and were presumably more impaired).

The suicide rate for the less impaired users who got mental health treatment was higher than that of the more impaired users who did not...

"The kinds of issues that people deal with that result in their getting psychiatric drugs are not helped by psychiatric drugs, which can only harm the brain and make it more difficult to feel your feelings and to think clearly.

They drug the veterans, hoping basically to stupefy them and make them passive so they won't demand services. I think it's a crime that those who are veterans, who have survived our wars, are being killed off by the pharmaceutical empire and its practices."

Nov 01, 2016:

Fact-checking "10 Lies You Were Told About Islam" (in three parts)


[liznote: Caution. These videos are presented solely for the copiously collected, verifiable and well-presented facts contained in them. Facts stand on their own. Dr. Wood is brilliant but he also is emotionally disturbed and has distorted cognition, what psychs call a psychopath, someone who lacks emotions and empathy. In prison in his 20s after the attempted murder of his father, he converted to Christianity after long periods of physical misery and apparent lifelong confusion, both situational and self-induced. He later received a doctorate in theological philosophy. In matters not involving the recitation of facts, his thinking remains problematic. (Ditto by the way the thinking and/or emotions of many who once were so inculcated in or dependent upon any belief system -- religious, delusional, malignant, benign or otherwise -- which they later fell from, sometimes after long periods of "searching", that they remain consumed with arguing in opposition to their former beliefs, and/or justifying their new "enlightenment". E.g. eternal "recovery" crap, scientism, etc.)]

Oct 28, 2016:

Top 100 Wikileaked Emails About Hillary

Top 100 Wikileaked Emails About Hillary

Top 100 Damaging Wilikeaks about Hillary

Top 100 Wikileaked Emails About Hillary

"The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it." -- George Orwell

[Below is a convenient list. Go to the URL at Most Damaging Wikileaks for numerous cites, detail, and links to documents.

      1. Obama lied: he knew about Hillary's secret server and wrote to her using a pseudonym, cover-up happened (intent to destroy evidence)

      2. Hillary Clinton dreams of completely "open trade and open borders"

      3. Hillary Clinton took money from and supported nations that she KNEW funded ISIS and terrorists

      4. Hillary has public positions on policy and her private ones

      5. Paying people to incite violence and unrest at Trump rallies

      6. Hillary's campaign wants "unaware" and "compliant" citizens

      7. Top Hillary aides mock Catholics for their faith

      8. Hillary deleted her incriminating emails. State covered it up. Asked about using White House executive privilege to hide from Congress.

      9. Bribery: King of Morocco gives Clinton Foundation $12 million to have meeting with Hillary, 6 months later Morocco gets weapons

      10. Latinos are "needy". Latino outreach is "taco bowl engagement"

      11. Clinton campaign in direct communication with DOJ regarding email case

      12. Acknowledging radical Islam is a real threat and a "serious problem for our future"

      13. Admitting terrorists will infiltrate the Syrian refugee program

      14. Bill Clinton receives $1 million "birthday gift" from ISIS-funding Qatar while Hillary was SoS, Qatar receives arms flow increases of 1,482%

      15. Hillary campaign prays for shooters in news stories to be white

      16. Hillary is still privately against gay marriage

      17. Rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders (DNC favored Hillary)

      18. Rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders (Hillary's team)

      19. State Department tried to bribe FBI to un-classify Clinton emails (FBI docs)

      20. Hillary was hateful, neglectful, above the law, "contemptuous" to her security detail, and "blatantly disregarded" security, (FBI docs)

      21. Clinton Foundation schemed with Big Pharma to keep the price of AIDS drugs high in America

      22. CNN leaked primary debate question to Hillary through head of DNC

      23. Democrats created fake Trump "grope under the meeting table" Craigslist employment ad in May 2016

      24. Hillary's camp excited about a black teen's murder (to help her agenda)

      25. Rigging media polls through oversampling

      26. Hillary sends U.S. intelligence and war plans to Podesta's hacked email

      27. Hillary took money from foreigners for campaign (illegal)

      28. Hillary says climate change activists should "get a life"

      29. Hillary is pro-fracking, calls it "a gift", despite what she publicly says

      30. Referring to a "Shadow Government" that protects Hillary (FBI docs)

      31. List of reporters that Hillary wined and dined, including biggest journalists and pundits of CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, NY Times, and a lot more. Off the record.

      32. Democrats using American lobbyists to money launder foreign donations illegally

      33. The New York Times is colluding with Hillary, allowed quote edits

      34. Racist remarks about Blacks and Muslims

      35. Hillary's poor health (collapsing, memory loss, drug research)

      36. Tipped off by the State Department regarding Benghazi emails

      37. Hillary's staff admitting she is "tainted" and "really vulnerable" on corruption and bribery

      38. Hillary camp using "propaganda"

      39. Hillary Clinton bragged about being invited to Putin's 'Inner Sanctum'

      40. John Podesta's password is p@ssw0rd

      41. Hillary Clinton had to be told when to smile during speeches

      42. Billionaire George Soros has influence over Hillary

      43. Clinton campaign refuses to report sexual harassment (then forwards complaint to harasser)

      44. Admitting Hillary did not use private server for security reasons
      (shows intent)

      45. Hillary Clinton "doesn't seem to know what planet we are all living in at the moment"

      46. Big media collusion email, working with reporters

      47. Using female senator to conjure fake sexist claims against Bernie

      48. Worried that Bernie supporters and younger women "hate her so much (they) might even vote for a Republican"

      49. Hillary campaign caught partaking in insider trading (illegal)

      50. Clinton Foundation did not pay for the services they received

      51. Admitting Hillary failed foreign policy

      52. Admitting Obamacare isn't working

      53. NBC colluding with the Clinton campaign

      54. Coordinating with SuperPACs, which is illegal

      55. Hillary's team admitting she lies a lot

      56. Avoiding the press because of tough questions

      57. Plotting to attack Obama because "his father was a Muslim"

      58. Colluding over withholding Benghazi emails

      59. Hillary plans to support the TPP

      60. Clinton camp worried that Uranium One deal is being investigated (where Hillary sold 20% of America's uranium to Russia)

      61. Entire "interview" with MSNBC's Chris Hayes is staged, reading word-for-word

      62. Hillary Clinton stole furniture from the State Department (FBI docs)

      63. Hillary told Tim Kaine back in July 2015 he would be VP

      64. Hillary tweaks her policies based on donors' wants

      65. Hillary camp admits it doesn't support $15 minimum wage

      66. Illegally coordinating with Priorities USA, a SuperPAC funded by George Soros

      67. Racist and sexist remarks: "too white and too male"

      68. Podesta illegally has access to top secret information

      69. Podesta connects to unsecure network where anyone could access classified files

      70. Hillary's speechwriters: "I don't mind the 'backs of dead Americans' because we need a bit of moral outrage." (Benghazi)

      71. The AP colluding with the Hillary campaign

      72. Hillary's camp says she has a "character problem" and is "arrogant"

      73. Staging fake anti-Trump protest, conspiring with Univision CEO

      74. Meeting to go over Cheryl Mills' testimony

      75. Iran nuclear deal was "greatest appeasement since Chamberlain gave Czechoslovakia to Hitler"

      76. Journalist talks strategy with Clinton staff and asks for permission to write article

      77. Bill Clinton admits Clinton Foundation has no "real projects"

      78. Violating campaign finance law

      79. Interfering with the 2008 Republican primary process

      80. Proof that "Correct the Record" (SuperPAC) is directly coordinating with the Hillary campaign against federal campaign law

      81. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg in direct contact with the Hillary campaign

      82. Hillary's team working with hundreds of MSM news pundits

      83. Katy Perry is a puppet for Hillary Clinton

      84. Hillary tries to hide her tiny rallies

      85. Hillary had a mole working on Biden's team

      86. John Oliver caught colluding with Hillary's campaign

      87. Trouble with NBC so they call Chuck Todd to take care of it

      88. Politico's Glenn Thrush colluding with Hillary's campaign, admits to being a "hack"

      89. Hillary finds out more debate questions

      90. Hillary wants "successful business people" running for office because "they cannot be bought"

      91. "We are finishing up the next round of TV scripts"

      92. Hillary doesn't write her own tweets, despite claiming "H" means she does

      93. On Hillary: "we just keep giving her poll-tested lines that don't work"

      94. Hillary extremely weak on topic of standing up to Wall Street

      95. "Even a clown like Ted Cruz" could beat her

      96. "The Huffington Post" colluding with Hillary

      97. Clinton campaign memorizing their email cover-up script

      98. Heavy press collusion over Cuba and Hillary's health

      99. Employment rate -- They confirm what Trump says

      100. Obama picked people in his administration from the suggestion list of CiTi bank advisor/Wall St shill


Except as otherwise noted, all contents in this collection are copyright 1996-2016 the liz library. All rights reserved.
This site is hosted and maintained by Send queries to: